Fact-Check: 5 Words Donald Trump Frequently Misuses, According To Seth Meyers

Shawn

3 min read

Post on Jun 20, 2025

4.3

Share

Fact-Check: 5 Words Donald Trump Frequently Misuses, According to Seth Meyers

Late-night comedian Seth Meyers has made a career out of dissecting the words and actions of politicians, and former President Donald Trump has often been a prime target of his comedic critiques. Recently, Meyers highlighted five words frequently misused by Trump, sparking online discussions and fact-checking efforts. This article delves into those words, examining their correct usage and providing examples of Trump's misapplication. Understanding these nuances not only sharpens our critical thinking skills but also allows us to better understand the subtle ways language can be manipulated.

1. "Tremendous": An Overused Superlative

Meyers frequently points out Trump's overuse of "tremendous," often applying it to situations where a more accurate descriptor would be needed. While "tremendous" does mean extraordinarily large or great, its constant repetition dilutes its impact and suggests a lack of nuanced vocabulary. Trump has used it to describe everything from economic growth (which may have been moderate) to his own perceived successes (which may be subjective). A fact-check of Trump's use of "tremendous" often reveals a disconnect between the word's intended meaning and the reality of the situation. This demonstrates the importance of using precise language to accurately convey information.

2. "Bigly": A Non-Word (Or Is It?)

Perhaps one of the most infamous examples, "bigly" entered the lexicon thanks to Trump's frequent use. While some argue it's a regional dialect variation of "big league," it's not recognized by most dictionaries. Meyers highlights this as an example of Trump's casual disregard for proper English and the potential for miscommunication when using non-standard language. The debate surrounding "bigly" underscores the importance of using established vocabulary to ensure clear communication.

3. "Sad!": A Simple, Yet Manipulative Word

While seemingly innocuous, Meyers suggests that Trump's frequent use of "Sad!" functions as a rhetorical device to dismiss criticism or deflect attention. By attaching this single word to dissenting opinions or unfavorable news stories, Trump attempts to frame them as pathetic or insignificant. Fact-checking reveals that this tactic is often used to avoid engaging with substantive arguments. The use of "Sad!" in this context showcases the manipulative power of even simple words.

4. "Winning": A Declaration, Not a Fact

Trump often declared himself a "winner," irrespective of objective metrics. Meyers' point highlights the difference between subjective perception and verifiable facts. Claiming victory doesn't necessarily equate to achieving actual success. Many instances of Trump claiming "winning" have been readily fact-checked and debunked, showcasing the importance of basing assertions on evidence rather than personal declarations.

5. "Fake News": A Dismissive Label, Not a Critical Analysis

This is perhaps the most widely discussed term. Trump's frequent use of "fake news" to discredit unfavorable media coverage, without providing specific examples of factual inaccuracies, has been widely criticized. Meyers argues that this label serves to dismiss legitimate journalistic inquiry and undermine public trust in credible news sources. This tactic, as numerous fact-checking organizations have demonstrated, is a dangerous form of misinformation and undermines a free press.

Conclusion: The Importance of Precise Language

Seth Meyers' observations on Donald Trump's word choices underscore the importance of careful and accurate language use. While humorously presented, his critiques highlight the ways language can be used to manipulate, misinform, and obfuscate. By understanding these examples, we can become more critical consumers of information and more effective communicators ourselves. Remember to always fact-check and analyze information critically before accepting it as truth. What are your thoughts on this? Let us know in the comments below!